Next Event: DECEMBER 11 – 2021 IDFA UNIVERSE (Amateur & Pro) Online Natural Bodybuilding Championships

2013 IDFA SASKATCHEWAN CLASSIC Results – OCTOBER 12

2013 IDFA SASKATCHEWAN CLASSIC Official Results

<<< CLICK Here for PHOTOS on Facebook >>>

WOMEN’S NOVICE FITNESS MODEL- SHORT
                                                            Score*
1.Jayde Gorling (Regina, SK)           4  Overall Winner
2.Ranee Leduc (Grand Coulee, SK) 5
3.Peru Morena De Lunas (Regina,SK) 10
4.Katerina Laloudakis (Regina, SK) 12
5.Leanne Fisher (Regina, SK)         14

WOMEN’S NOVICE FITNESS MODEL- TALL
                                                       Score*
1.Amber Kapell (Regina, SK)        4
2.Olecia Obarianyk (Regina, SK) 6
3.Tara McCallum (Regina, SK)     8
4.Karla Mittermayr (Regina, SK) 13
5.Jayme Ast (Regina, SK)               14

MEN’S NOVICE BODYBUILDING
                                                            Score*
1.Curtis Korchinski (Saskatoon, SK) 3
2.Frank Lasby (Regina, SK)                6

WOMEN’S NOVICE FIGURE
                                          Score*
1.Jayme Ast (Regina, SK) 3

WOMEN’S MASTERS FITNESS MODEL
                                                           Score*
1.Katerina Laloudakis (Regina, SK) 3

MEN’S MASTERS BODYBUILDING
                                                   Score*
1.Eduardo Moya (Regina, SK) 3

WOMEN’S OPEN FITNESS MODEL
                                                    Score*
1.Michelle Espino (Regina, SK) 3 New IDFA Pro

MEN’S OPEN BODYBUILDING
                                                         Score*
1.Abimbola Aina (Regina, SK)         3 New IDFA Pro
2.Eduardo Moya (Regina, SK)         6
3.Efe Patrick Omene (Regina, SK) 9
4.Ty Friesen (Winnipeg, MB)          12

WOMEN’S OPEN FIGURE
                                                        Score*
1.Melissa Vuckovic (Regina, SK) 3 New IDFA Pro

*Scoring
Scoring is done by ranking each competitor. Ranking is done by comparing the physiques of each competitor of each class and ranking them from highest to lowest. The best competitor should be assigned a rank of 1, the next highest competitor should get a rank of 2, and so on.
The highest and lowest rank for each competitor is discarded as a safeguard against favouritism and to protect against human error. The remaining scores are added, and the lowest total receives first place in the class. Second lowest total receives 2nd place, and so on. If a tie results, the competitor who was ranked highest among the tied competitors by a majority of all judges receives the highest placement.

-END-

Leave a Comment


3 − = one

Website by MediaTeknix