2012 IDFA PRO UNIVERSE – NOVEMBER 3

Click here to see the IDFA World Championships (Novice, Open, Masters) Results.

2012 IDFA PRO UNIVERSE Official Results

PRO FITNESS MODEL
                                                                               Score*
1.Kim Chartrand (Ottawa, ON)                            3          750.00 Cash
2.Caroline Mailhot (Gatineau, QC)                       6          250.00 Cash
3.Katherine Turcotte Gagnon (QC)                      9          100.00 Cash

PRO BODYBUILDING – LIGHTWEIGHT
                                                                               Score*
1.Kent Bierly (Brick, NJ, USA)                            3          750.00 Cash
2.Edmund Hayford (Edmonton, AB)                   6          250.00 Cash
3.Cameron Hacault (Victoria, BC)                       9          100.00 Cash

PRO BODYBUILDING – HEAVYWEIGHT
                                                                               Score*
1.Erik Alstrup (Toronto, ON)                               3     1,000 Cash, OVERALL
2.Frank Apuzzo (Toronto, ON)                            6          250.00 Cash
3.Curt Griffin (Lasalle, QC)                                 9          100.00 Cash
4.Simon Proteau (Ste-Anne-des-lacs, QC)           13
5.Lou Noel (Burnaby, BC)                                  15
6.Rob Deluca (Ancaster, ON)                             18
7.Chad Brandt (Lethbridge, AB)                          21
8.Michael Calaminici (Toronto, ON)                     24

PRO FIGURE
                                                                               Score*
1.Robin Clay (Barrie, ON)                            3          750.00 Cash
2.Lisa Moskaluk (Toronto, ON)                           6          250.00 Cash
3.Cindy Currie (Niagara Falls, ON)                      9          100.00 Cash
4.Marie-Chantal DiGuardo (Nepean, ON)             12
5.Laura Jackson (Toronto, ON)                           15

*Scoring
Scoring is done by ranking each competitor. Ranking is done by comparing the physiques of each competitor of each class and ranking them from highest to lowest. The best competitor should be assigned a rank of 1, the next highest competitor should get a rank of 2, and so on.
The highest and lowest rank for each competitor is discarded as a safeguard against favouritism and to protect against human error. The remaining scores are added, and the lowest total receives first place in the class. Second lowest total receives 2nd place, and so on. If a tie results, the competitor who was ranked highest among the tied competitors by a majority of all judges receives the highest placement.

-END-